Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-pagenavi domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/chanad5h/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the post-slider-and-carousel domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/chanad5h/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/chanad5h/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Tata Steel to go ahead with £1.25-billion investment
    Tata Steel Q4 records highest annual crude steel production
    Tata Steel to go ahead with £1.25 bn investment

    (20 second reading) Tata Steel announced that the steelmaker will proceed with its £1.25-billion investment to build an electric arc furnace in Port Talbot, replacing two blast furnaces and commence closure of the existing heavy end assets in the following months.
    Tata Steel said it has informed the trade unions that Port Talbot’s two Blast Furnaces No.5 and No.4 will close by the end of June, and by the end of September, respectively. This is in contrary to the union’s plan which would have kept a blast furnace in operation while building an electric arc furnace.
    Tata Steel pointed out that the alternative plan presented by the union would involve additional costs of at least £1.6 billion